Tag Archive for 'commentary'

Michael Moore’s SiCKO

I just watched SiCKO, Michael Moore’s doc blasting the U.S. healthcare system. His message: the U.S. healthcare system puts profits in direct opposition to patients, and the profits win every time.

Now, Michael Moore documentaries all have the same basic problem: his argument is just as simplistically one-sided as the arguments of the politicians and corporate bosses he lampoons, he’s just on the other side. So his technique is inherently hypocritical: if it’s bad when Capitol Hill and FOX News does it, why’s it good when he does it? The issue is obviously more complex than “U.S. sux, Canada/Britain/France/Cuba rawks!” but Moore too busy with anecdotes and outrage to get to it.

That said, the guy’s absolutely right.

We need a uniquely American solution in which the public and private sectors work together to make sure that everyone has high-quality, affordable healthcare. (Karen Ignagni, President of the trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans.)

Why is U.S. healthcare so pathetic? Why are HMOs in the business of denying claims, rather than helping patients? We’re blind to the obvious because it’s just par for American life, because we don’t know any better so we think we’re the best. America spends 16% of its GDP on healthcare, proportionally and per-capita more than any other nation in the world. And yet, it’s the U.S. that ranks 37th, just ahead of Slovenia. And yet, it’s the Canadians, the British, the French, the Cubans who can walk into any public hospital and get checked-up, medicated, operated on, saved, who don’t even have the concept of being “denied” treatment, because to do so would be incurably inhumane.

There’s a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part, you can’t even passively take part, and you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop! And you’ve got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all! (Mario Savio, Berkeley Free Speech Movement)

Why do we have “free” K-12 education, complementary police and firefighters, but not free healthcare? If we think it’s important for everyone to be educated, secure, and safe, why don’t we think it’s important for everyone to be healthy? We’re afraid that universal healthcare will be badly mishandled, will remove “choice,” will be catastrophically numb and bureaucratic, but could anything be more mishandled, constrained, and willfully bureaucratic than our odious axis of HMOs?

SiCKO gets in our face, gets us talking about the nightmare of American healthcare, and that’s why for all its faults it’s still worth your time. Go see it: it’ll be good for you.

Many Korean-American students left campus immediately

By now you’ve all heard that a South Korean student, Cho Seung-Hui, was responsible for the Virginia Tech massacre.

What I want to know is: why are we being told he’s Korean? Why is his ethnicity even relevant?

Asian-American students at Virginia Tech reacted to news about the gunman’s identity with shock and some anxiety about a possible backlash.

‘My parents are actually worried about retaliation against Asians,’ said Lyu Boaz, a third-year accounting student who was born in South Korea and became an American citizen a year ago. ‘After 9/11, a lot of Arabs were attacked for that reason.’

Mr. Boaz, a resident adviser at Pritchard Hall, said many Korean-American students left campus immediately. Parents of other Korean-American students were preparing to pick up their children this afternoon and take them home. (”Faculty was concerned about gunman.” NYT)

And, why the hell would anyone seek revenge on other Asian students, simply because the gunman was Asian? What is this national sickness, where those of the same ethnicity must fear their fellow Americans? It should go without saying: murder isn’t some kind of Asian trait. No one should have to fear a “backlash.” Cho Seung-Hui massacred 32 people because of who he was and what he had become, not because he was South Korean!

A plural plurality

You know, Alf, I’m not totally down with your last entry, “Empowerment.” It’s a good read, but I don’t agree with the last half. To begin with the end:

“In the 1960s, college students formed a core of activism, as they do today. But since the time when Berkeley students declared that they weren’t going to settle for being the ‘raw materials’ of the machine, the hippies have been mostly replaced by Asians. Though there is a sizable Asian political movement, it’s still dismal in comparison to most every other political movement. [&hellip] San Francisco is a third Asian, but even a lot of people in the Bay Area don’t know that. Where is the unity? Where is the leadership, where are the iconic figures? Are we all just going to be the Man’s token lackeys?”

Thing is, Asians aren’t black. You’re forcing a crude comparison. We weren’t abducted from our home continent, largely erased of our cultures, sentenced to a subhuman tier of society, and then united in an upward fight. Asians largely arrived of our own will, with differing skills, from different social classes, at many different times, and&mash;as the Chinatowns, Koreatowns, Little Tokyos, Little Saigons, etc., demonstrate—with our own distinct cultures. Largely speaking, “black” refers to one people, one culture, a distinct race formed over hundreds of years on a new and isolated continent. On the other hand, the term “Asian” is a total misnomer, a blunt tool used to handle hundreds of millions of people with dramatically different cultures, classes, and situations. Asian American culture, as it’s practiced, is a strange mixture of white culture and Asian stereotypes embraced by Asians.

Thus, what would “unite” us? Why should we unite, when we’re all so different—when we’re widely (if not necessarily overwhelmingly) represented at all social levels, all income levels, all levels of culture, and all levels of education? Is it because we all happen to originate on the world’s largest continent? A dearth of Asians in public society isn’t a conspiracy, nor is it oppression; it’s simply a product a combination of demographics and a lack of reason for cohesion. Just as there aren’t really issues that unite all “white” people, there aren’t really any issues that unite all “Asians.” (Perhaps except immigration.) I don’t think Asian Americans vote by National Census Category any more than whites do; they vote according to what candidates best represent their [broad] interests.

It’s not that “the hippies have been replaced by Asians,” it’s that “the 1960s have been replaced by the 2000s.” Unity in activism and revolution come together under very distinct circumstances, and in America those circumstances don’t quite exist. One circumstance is fear: the 60s saw the draft, and thus the widespread fear of seeing oneself or one’s loved ones sent to die, by the country itself. Another circumstance is severe dissatisfaction: the 60s also saw unified disgust against discrimination and crumbling faith in state and national government. So, basically, enough people have to be scared shitless, or enough people have to be fucked over, otherwise the economic/personal incentive to unite and fight just isn’t there. (See France, the Ukraine, and the Seattle WTO protests.) As you paraphrased your professor, youth [lack] the will to fight because “conditions [are] better.”

*As a sidenote, regarding the lack of Asians in entertainment… I think, give it time. Blacks and Europeans have been here for hundreds of years. By contrast, most American Asian families are barely a generation in, if that. Fresh-off-the-boat, upwardly mobile Asian parents are understandably eager for family security, thus the love affair with Law, Medicine, and Engineering. They’re not exactly eager to see lil’ Alex or Grace take the family’s future and blow it all in Hollywood.

After a few generations, when Asian families are more established and their children are more financially expendable, I think ours numbers in entertainment will rise. And hey, on the bright side, there’s already a lot of entertainin’ Asians… in Asia. The Asian film industry is nearing the prestige of the European film industry (No One Knows, Crouching Tiger, 2046, Beijing Bicycle, etc.), and the home country’s legitimacy will help with legitimacy in America.

News Name

Dear Mary Cheney,

Congratulations on your pregnancy! Please take note that your name is now “Cheney’s Lesbian Daughter.” You are hereby instructed to suspend any previous individual identity you may have futilely maintained.

Best regards,
-The International News Media

We broke it, we bought it

America, we can’t “cut and run” from Iraq.

This is precisely the worst time to leave Iraq. To quote James Baker (of the Iraq Study Group), abandoning Iraq would mean “the biggest civil war you’ve ever seen.” Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish groups are all jockeying to partition Iraq into autonomous states. Without Hussein’s forced pseudo-peace, de facto war amongst Shia militias, Sunni militias, and the new state “police” has already killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Militia-lead ethnic cleansing long ago began, and would only accelerate with a set-in-stone pullout.

The only thing really holding the country together is America. Ironically, Iraq’s best hope for peace is the country that invaded it. To echo The Economist, America can’t do jack shit about Iraq if America isn’t in Iraq. We need to solidify our commitment and take the responsibility we asked for. Main-line Democrats and Republicans need to jointly declare that leaving Iraq in good condition is America’s best interest. A chaotic Iraq would destroy what little stability the Middle East still has, thus screwing over both Americans and Middle Easterners. Meanwhile, Bush needs to stop saying things like “the terrorists are trying to influence public opinion here in the United States” and “break our will.” Bush, seriously, shut the fuck up. People want to leave in Iraq not because of terrorist propaganda, but because you did such a jolly shitty job both invading and rebuilding it.

Next, America needs to somehow cultivate moderation in Iraq. Yeah, easier said than done, but still true. You can’t have a democracy when one third of the citizens want to murder the other two-thirds, and vice versa, and vice versa. You can’t have a country when the three constituent groups want their own countries (and wouldn’t mind a lil’ genocide along the way).

The best thing America can do now is ensure security, while keeping its hands off the actual government. No puppet governors, no obvious political intervention. Legitimacy is the currency of any relevant government, and the Iraqi government needs it badly. Meanwhile, moderate officials must be able to get to work without being blown up or shot. If moderation is seen as siding with “the Great Satan,” then budding moderates are literally as good as dead.