By now you’ve all heard that a South Korean student, Cho Seung-Hui, was responsible for the Virginia Tech massacre.
What I want to know is: why are we being told he’s Korean? Why is his ethnicity even relevant?
Asian-American students at Virginia Tech reacted to news about the gunman’s identity with shock and some anxiety about a possible backlash.
‘My parents are actually worried about retaliation against Asians,’ said Lyu Boaz, a third-year accounting student who was born in South Korea and became an American citizen a year ago. ‘After 9/11, a lot of Arabs were attacked for that reason.’
Mr. Boaz, a resident adviser at Pritchard Hall, said many Korean-American students left campus immediately. Parents of other Korean-American students were preparing to pick up their children this afternoon and take them home. (”Faculty was concerned about gunman.” NYT)
And, why the hell would anyone seek revenge on other Asian students, simply because the gunman was Asian? What is this national sickness, where those of the same ethnicity must fear their fellow Americans? It should go without saying: murder isn’t some kind of Asian trait. No one should have to fear a “backlash.” Cho Seung-Hui massacred 32 people because of who he was and what he had become, not because he was South Korean!
Michael Moore’s SiCKO
I just watched SiCKO, Michael Moore’s doc blasting the U.S. healthcare system. His message: the U.S. healthcare system puts profits in direct opposition to patients, and the profits win every time.
Now, Michael Moore documentaries all have the same basic problem: his argument is just as simplistically one-sided as the arguments of the politicians and corporate bosses he lampoons, he’s just on the other side. So his technique is inherently hypocritical: if it’s bad when Capitol Hill and FOX News does it, why’s it good when he does it? The issue is obviously more complex than “U.S. sux, Canada/Britain/France/Cuba rawks!” but Moore too busy with anecdotes and outrage to get to it.
That said, the guy’s absolutely right.
Why is U.S. healthcare so pathetic? Why are HMOs in the business of denying claims, rather than helping patients? We’re blind to the obvious because it’s just par for American life, because we don’t know any better so we think we’re the best. America spends 16% of its GDP on healthcare, proportionally and per-capita more than any other nation in the world. And yet, it’s the U.S. that ranks 37th, just ahead of Slovenia. And yet, it’s the Canadians, the British, the French, the Cubans who can walk into any public hospital and get checked-up, medicated, operated on, saved, who don’t even have the concept of being “denied” treatment, because to do so would be incurably inhumane.
Why do we have “free” K-12 education, complementary police and firefighters, but not free healthcare? If we think it’s important for everyone to be educated, secure, and safe, why don’t we think it’s important for everyone to be healthy? We’re afraid that universal healthcare will be badly mishandled, will remove “choice,” will be catastrophically numb and bureaucratic, but could anything be more mishandled, constrained, and willfully bureaucratic than our odious axis of HMOs?
SiCKO gets in our face, gets us talking about the nightmare of American healthcare, and that’s why for all its faults it’s still worth your time. Go see it: it’ll be good for you.